Radiocarbon dating is accurate for dates ranging
None of these early faster half-lives would be the same as they are today.As time progressed each would begin to acquire its slower modern-day stable half-life, but would they all acquire these stable rates in a uniformity which would keep them all in synchrony? If they did, all would give the same ages, you are right.The samples of bone were blind samples.""Of course carbon dating isn't going to work on your Allosaurus bone. So I would expect to get some weird number like 16,000 years if you carbon date a millions of years old fossil.16.000 years by the way is still 10,000 years before your God supposedly created the Earth." Amy M 12/11/01 My response: I explain the limits of Carbon dating below.They ignore evidence that does not fit their preconceived notion.What would happen if a dinosaur bone were carbon dated?This date did not fit the preconceived notion that dinosaurs lived millions of years ago. They do this many times, using a different dating method each time.
The uses of chitin dates, in particular the archaeological and palaeoenvironmental applications, are also discussed.
"The rock question is fairly simple and has to do with the basic elements which made up these rocks in the beginning.
When each of these elements, uranium, potassium, radium etc.
What many do not realize is that carbon dating is not used to date dinosaurs. Carbon dating is only accurate back a few thousand years.
So if scientists believe that a creature lived millions of years ago, then they would need to date it another way. They assume dinosaurs lived millions of years ago (instead of thousands of years ago like the bible says).